They used geometric progression to disprove vampires - - - that's what we get when we let physicists try their hands at math - bah.
The two assumptions they make: #1 - all victims of vampires become vampires & #2 all vampires must feed at least once a month and all their victims necessarily perish (become vampires) are . . .
Illogical and not based on vampire fiction - even ancient vampire fiction.
As far as I know the existence of vampires more simply can be disproven by physiology.
Mathematically, I don't think you can disprove the existence of Vampires through population statistics given the amount of variables you'd have to arbitrarily fix.
Of course, I also didn't write an article about it . . .
They used geometric progression to disprove vampires - - - that's what we get when we let physicists try their hands at math - bah.
ReplyDeleteThe two assumptions they make: #1 - all victims of vampires become vampires & #2 all vampires must feed at least once a month and all their victims necessarily perish (become vampires) are . . .
Illogical and not based on vampire fiction - even ancient vampire fiction.
Good point.
ReplyDeleteSo, math-guy... can vampires be disproven by math?
As far as I know the existence of vampires more simply can be disproven by physiology.
ReplyDeleteMathematically, I don't think you can disprove the existence of Vampires through population statistics given the amount of variables you'd have to arbitrarily fix.
Of course, I also didn't write an article about it . . .